Sign in Subscribe

Are real-time dashboards worth the investment?

Are real-time dashboards worth the investment?
Photo by Icons8 Team / Unsplash

Most companies waste $40,000+ building real-time dashboards that executives check twice a week—here's how to know if you actually need one.

Every month, someone asks for a dashboard that updates in real-time. They're certain they need it. The data must refresh constantly, they say, or they'll miss something critical. But when you check back three months later, you find they look at it twice a week, always on Tuesday mornings and Friday afternoons. This happens so often it's become predictable. The pattern reveals something important about how we think about data versus how we actually use it.

What we'll cover:

What is a real-time dashboard and how does it actually work?

When people say real-time, they rarely mean the same thing. To a financial trader, real-time means milliseconds. To a sales manager, it might mean five minutes. The term has become so loose it's almost meaningless without qualification.

True real-time systems capture changes as they happen and push them immediately to displays. A dashboard is a graphical interface that provides at-a-glance views of data relevant to a particular objective—when it's real-time, that view updates continuously. A sensor detects movement, the database records it, and your screen updates within milliseconds.

This requires a fundamentally different architecture than traditional reporting:

  • Streaming platforms like Apache Kafka or AWS Kinesis
  • Specialized time-series databases optimized for high-frequency writes
  • Infrastructure that never stops processing data

The technical implementation matters because it determines cost. Change Data Capture monitors your source databases and catches every insert, update, and delete the moment it happens. These changes flow through a streaming pipeline, get transformed in flight, and land in your analytics database within seconds. The whole system runs continuously, which means continuous compute costs.

As data engineers discuss on Reddit, building true real-time dashboards requires navigating complex tradeoffs between latency, cost, and reliability that batch systems simply don't face.

The spectrum of data freshness

Compare different refresh approaches:

  • Real-time: Updates in 100 milliseconds to 1 second
  • Near real-time: Processes data every 30-60 seconds
  • Traditional batch: Refreshes hourly or daily on schedule

Each approach sits on a spectrum of latency and complexity. The difference between milliseconds and minutes matters enormously in some contexts and not at all in others.

Why do business stakeholders always request real-time dashboards?

There's a psychology to wanting instant information. It feels modern. It feels like you're on top of things. When you see numbers updating constantly, it creates a sense of control, even if you can't actually do anything with the data any faster.

This illusion is powerful. Executives request real-time dashboards the way they request corner offices. It's partly about the substance and partly about the symbol. Having access to live data signals you're important enough to need it, even when you're not. As one frustrated analyst asked on Reddit: "Can someone explain why users ask for dashboards and then never use them?"

The real problem hiding beneath

But beneath the psychology often lies a real problem that real-time data won't solve. Someone says they need real-time sales numbers, but what they really mean is they wish they knew about problems sooner.

They're confusing the symptom with the cure. What they actually need is better alerting when sales drop below threshold, not a dashboard that updates every second while they're in meetings.

The gap between perceived need and actual usage is vast. Studies of dashboard platforms consistently show that refresh frequency has little correlation with how often people actually look at dashboards. People want five-second updates but check once a day. This disconnect wastes enormous resources.

How often do people actually look at real-time dashboards after they're delivered?

There's a phenomenon I call Monday morning dashboard syndrome.

Someone gets a beautiful new real-time dashboard delivered. They watch it obsessively for a week, checking it dozens of times per day. Then they check it a few times per day. Then once per day. Then only on Monday mornings when preparing for the weekly meeting.

This pattern is so common that data professionals regularly discuss it on forums like r/BusinessIntelligence, where analysts share frustrations about stakeholders requesting elaborate dashboards that ultimately go unused. Another thread on r/analytics asked: "Anyone else sick of building dashboards that nobody looks at?"

What the data reveals

Usage patterns tell a consistent story:

  • Most executives check dashboards 1-2 times daily, regardless of refresh rate
  • They look at them when they have time to think about what the numbers mean
  • Not whenever the numbers change
  • The dashboard might update every second, but humans don't process information every second

Research on dashboard usage across enterprise BI platforms shows that refresh frequency and viewing frequency diverge dramatically after deployment. A dashboard refreshing every 30 seconds might be viewed three times per week. The expensive real-time infrastructure sits idle 99.9% of the time between those views.

Why this matters

This matters because the primary driver of real-time dashboard cost is continuous processing, not query frequency. You pay for data to stream whether anyone's watching or not. It's like leaving your car running 24/7 because occasionally you need to drive somewhere immediately.

The disconnect between request urgency and consumption behavior suggests that when stakeholders say they need real-time data, they're expressing anxiety about decision latency, not data latency. Those are different problems requiring different solutions. Understanding this distinction is fundamental to effective business intelligence strategy. Data professionals frequently express this frustration in communities like r/analytics, where the pattern of building complex dashboards that see minimal use is a recurring theme.

Why do most analytics use cases not need real-time data updates?

Strategic decisions operate on longer timescales. When you're deciding whether to enter a new market, whether the data is from this morning or yesterday morning makes no difference. The trends you're analyzing span months or years. Adding real-time updates to strategic dashboards is like adding a stopwatch to a calendar.

The aggregation paradox

This creates what I call the aggregation paradox. Someone requests real-time daily active users. But calculating DAU in real-time is conceptually strange.

The metric represents a full day's activity, yet you want to recalculate it every second while the day is still unfolding. What you're really calculating is "how many users so far today," which is a different metric with different meaning. The premature aggregation gives false precision and encourages premature reaction to incomplete information.

Why rolling windows don't need real-time updates

Rolling windows present similar challenges:

  • A 30-day moving average doesn't meaningfully change when you add one more hour of data
  • The statistical noise from the additional data point is smaller than the measurement error in the existing data
  • Updating it in real-time serves no analytical purpose

The context problem

Seasonal patterns further complicate real-time analytics. Sales metrics affected by day of week, time of day, or seasonal trends require context that accumulates slowly. Tuesday morning sales look low compared to Monday, but that's expected. Real-time data without adequate historical context invites misinterpretation.

Analytics vs. alerting

The fundamental issue is that analytics and alerting are different activities requiring different tools:

  • Analytics explores patterns, tests hypotheses, and understands relationships. This happens in dedicated time blocks when someone focuses on thinking, not reacting.
  • Alerting interrupts you when specific conditions demand immediate attention.

Trying to serve both functions with a real-time dashboard creates something that does neither well.

What does it actually cost to build and maintain real-time dashboard infrastructure?

The technical requirements for real-time dashboards create costs that compound. You need Change Data Capture systems to monitor source databases, streaming platforms to move data continuously, specialized time-series databases optimized for high-frequency writes, and compute resources that scale to handle peak load while running 24/7.

Infrastructure costs

Small-scale real-time dashboard:

  • Monthly cloud services: ~$800
  • Annual infrastructure cost: ~$9,600

Enterprise-grade systems (millions of events):

  • Monthly cloud services: $3,000 to $5,000
  • Annual infrastructure cost: $36,000 to $60,000

These are recurring costs that continue whether anyone views the dashboard or not.

The technical complexity is substantial. Data engineers discuss the challenges of implementing real-time dashboards on forums like r/dataengineering, highlighting the infrastructure decisions and tradeoffs involved in building these systems.

Development costs

Building a real-time dashboard typically costs $5,000 to $20,000 compared to $2,000 to $10,000 for a traditional dashboard.

The additional cost comes from:

  • Managing streaming pipelines
  • Handling backpressure and failure recovery
  • Dealing with eventual consistency issues that don't exist in batch systems

The hidden costs

Engineering complexity may be the highest cost:

  • Real-time systems require specialists who understand distributed systems, streaming architectures, and operational challenges
  • These engineers are expensive and scarce
  • Opportunity cost: Having them build real-time infrastructure instead of revenue-generating features can dwarf infrastructure costs

Performance impact on production systems:

  • Change Data Capture and frequent queries add load to operational databases
  • Often requires provisioning additional database capacity specifically for analytics
  • This can double infrastructure costs

Maintenance burden:

  • Real-time data pipelines have more failure modes than batch systems
  • Connections can stall, schemas can drift, backpressure can build up
  • One team spent more time maintaining their real-time pipeline than building the original dashboard

The bottom line

Total cost of ownership for a real-time dashboard can easily exceed $50,000 in the first year between development, infrastructure, and maintenance.

Compare this to $10,000 for a near real-time solution with five-minute refresh intervals.

That forty thousand dollar difference buys a lot of other improvements.

What is the better alternative to real-time dashboards for most business needs?

Near real-time with configurable refresh intervals handles most use cases better than true real-time. Refreshing every five to sixty minutes provides data that feels current without the complexity and cost of streaming infrastructure.

The key insight: Most decisions don't meaningfully change when data is five minutes old versus five seconds old.

Five proven alternatives

1. Intelligent alerting systems

Instead of watching a dashboard waiting for something to happen, you configure thresholds and get notified immediately when they're breached:

  • This interrupts you only when necessary
  • Gives you time back for actual work
  • Sales dropped twenty percent in the last hour? You get an alert
  • Otherwise, you check the dashboard when you have time to think about it properly

2. Scheduled batch processing aligned with decision-making cadence

If you review metrics in Monday morning meetings, data that's six hours old when the meeting starts is perfectly adequate:

  • Run a batch process at 6 AM
  • Get fresh data when you need it
  • No infrastructure running overnight

3. Hybrid approaches

Combine the best of both worlds:

  • Real-time alerts notify you of exceptional conditions
  • Dashboards refresh periodically for routine monitoring
  • Recognizes that alerting and analytics serve different purposes

4. On-demand refresh capabilities

Give users current data exactly when they need it without the cost of continuous updates:

  • Add a refresh button that queries live data
  • Most of the time users view cached data from the last scheduled refresh
  • When they need current data, they click refresh and wait a few seconds
  • This simple pattern eliminates ninety percent of real-time infrastructure while providing real-time data when it actually matters

5. Near real-time with 5-minute intervals

The sweet spot for most business intelligence:

  • Feels immediate to users
  • Dramatically simpler infrastructure
  • 80% cost reduction compared to true real-time
  • Sufficient for 95% of business decisions

The practical pillars behind Annie

These are the practical conceptual pillars we've adopted while designing Annie by PandasAI to allow you to build dashboards that actually get used:

  • Intelligent refresh strategies that match decision-making cadence, not data velocity
  • Smart alerting that interrupts only when action is needed
  • On-demand refresh capabilities for when users genuinely need current data
  • Tiered access to balance real-time needs for operations with batch processing for strategy
  • Cost-conscious architecture that doesn't sacrifice capability for unnecessary complexity

The goal isn't to build the most technically impressive dashboard. It's to build the one that drives better decisions without turning implementation into a second engineering project.

How do you determine the right refresh rate for your dashboard?

Start by understanding the decision-making frequency. How often do users act on this data?

  • Daily decisions need daily data
  • Monthly reviews need data updated weekly at most
  • The refresh rate should match the cadence of decisions, not the velocity of data changes

Distinguish between two types of latency

Data latency is how long it takes data to reach the dashboard.
Query latency is how long it takes the dashboard to respond when someone opens it.

Users complaining about "slow" dashboards often mean query latency, not data latency. Optimizing query performance with better indexes and caching solves that problem more cheaply than real-time data pipelines.

Balance user experience with infrastructure costs

Test actual usage patterns:

  1. Deploy a dashboard with hourly refresh
  2. Monitor how often users click it
  3. If they check it twice daily, increase the refresh interval to four hours
  4. You'll save money without affecting user satisfaction

Create tiered refresh strategies

Different user roles have different needs:

  • Operational staff: 5-minute refresh for monitoring active processes
  • Executives: Daily refresh for strategic metrics
  • Analysts: Hourly refresh for deep-dive investigations

One-size-fits-all real-time infrastructure wastes resources.

The golden rule

The right refresh rate is the longest interval that still supports timely decisions.

Find that interval by asking users not when they want data updated, but when they would take different actions based on newer data.

When should you push back on real-time dashboard requirements?

Red flags appear in how stakeholders describe their needs. "I want to see it updating constantly" suggests fascination with the technology rather than a clear use case.

Real business needs come with specific scenarios: "When X metric drops below Y, I need to do Z within N minutes." Generic desires for real-time data usually indicate the stakeholder hasn't thought through how they'll use it.

Questions to ask stakeholders

When will you look at this dashboard?

  • What decisions will you make based on it?
  • How quickly must you make those decisions after the data changes?
  • How often do you expect to see concerning changes?

These questions expose whether real-time data serves a genuine need or represents wishful thinking.

Reframe around business outcomes

Instead of "I need real-time data", the conversation should be "I need to catch problems within fifteen minutes."

That outcome might be better achieved through alerting than through a real-time dashboard someone checks occasionally.

Explain the tradeoff concretely

Make the numbers real:

"Real-time infrastructure will cost $40,000 more than near real-time with five-minute refresh. That's enough budget to build three other dashboards you've requested. Are you confident real-time data will drive $40,000 of additional value?"

Making the tradeoff explicit helps stakeholders evaluate whether real-time is worth it.

Build trust through delivery

Often stakeholders request real-time because they've had bad experiences with batch systems that failed overnight and showed stale data all day.

A near real-time system with good monitoring and alerting proves you can deliver fresh data without the complexity of true real-time.

The goal

The goal isn't to deny people tools they need. It's to ensure investments align with value delivered.

  • Sometimes that means pushing back on real-time requirements and proposing better alternatives
  • Sometimes it means building the real-time dashboard because the use case genuinely demands it
  • The key is having the conversation grounded in costs, benefits, and actual usage patterns rather than assumptions

The bottom line

Most organizations would benefit more from better alerting and smarter batch processing than from real-time dashboards.

The infrastructure cost, engineering complexity, and maintenance burden of real-time systems makes sense for a small subset of use cases where immediate human response to changing data creates value. For everything else, near real-time data refreshed intelligently serves users better while freeing resources for initiatives with clearer returns.

How to evaluate requests

When someone requests a real-time dashboard, treat it as an opportunity to understand what problem they're really trying to solve. Often you'll discover that problem needs a different solution.

And when you do encounter genuine real-time use cases, you'll recognize them by how clearly stakeholders can articulate the immediate decisions they'll make with immediate data.

What actually matters

What matters isn't whether your dashboard updates in real-time. What matters is whether the people using it make better decisions because of it.

Build for that outcome, and the right refresh rate will become obvious.

How to build dashboards that actually get used

For teams looking to build dashboards that actually get used without breaking the budget, tools that balance power with simplicity can make all the difference.

Annie by PandasAI offers an alternative approach built on the principles outlined in this article:

  • Plug-and-play connectors that get you started quickly
  • AI-powered dashboard creation that adapts to your questions
  • Customizable with AI or UI for exactly the views you need
  • Infinite drill-down into your data when you need details
  • Intelligent refresh optimization that automatically determines the optimal refresh rate for each connector, balancing data freshness with system efficiency

Annie takes care of the technical complexity of determining refresh rates. Instead of forcing you to choose between real-time streaming and daily batches, it analyzes your data sources, usage patterns, and query characteristics to find the sweet spot—whether that's every 5 minutes, hourly, or daily. You get the freshness you need without paying for infrastructure you don't.

Whether you need updates every minute or every day, the goal is the same: turn data into decisions without turning dashboard development into a second job.